Rapid Recovery System

System Performance


The full cost of our architecture on I/O intensive workloads is 24% overhead for writes and 5% overhead for reads. The majority of that overhead is due to running the benchmark in the Linux guest. The cost of using a local NFS server is low. We ran the Integer and Floating point tests from Freebench in the same four configurations. We did not include these in the graph, but the overhead of our architecture was at most 1% for these tests.



The graphs above and below show the results of running IOzone read and write tests under 8 configurations. These configurations are 1) base Windows with a local file system, 2) base Windows with data mounted from the NFS virtual file server machine, 3) Windows running in a VMware guest with a file system local to the guest, 4) Windows running in a VMware guest with data mounted from the NFS virtual file server machine, 5) base Linux with a local file system, 6) base Linux with data mounted from the NFS virtual file server machine, 7) Linux running in a VMware guest with a file system local to the guest, and finally, 8) Linux running in a VMware guest with data mounted from the NFS virtual file server machine.